ELDORET, Kenya (PAMACC News) - Samson Tanui’s piece of land in Kesses, a village in the outskirts of Eldoret City is a living example of ecological farming, one of the themes that took centre stage at the just concluded 29th round of climate negotiations (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan.
On his plot, the father of two children has demonstrated how a quarter an acre of land can be used to produce food all year round without paying attention to seasonal rainfall, thereby generating daily income, and nourishing his family with fresh homegrown food.
“This garden is my ecological mini-supermarket,” said Tanui. “At any given time, my family has access to different types of fruits such as oranges, guavas, bananas, mangoes and berries among others, fresh leafy vegetables, eggs, honey, chicken meat, goat milk, rabbit meat, tubers, freshly picked cereals like perennial beans, and soon we will have fresh fish from our makeshift fish pond,” he said.
And now, experts at COP29 have called on leaders to avail funding for such innovative sustainable farming techniques as a way of building climate resilience and adaptation to climate change, thereby promoting sustainable food systems.
Tanui employs permaculture farming system with adherence to agroecological farming techniques, where crops depend on the livestock for soil fertility in order to produce food for the family, and fodder and feeds for the livestock. As a result, biodiversity thrives, with insects like bees relying on crop flowers to make honey, while in the process, they cross pollinate the crops.
During COP29 in Baku, delegates in different forums discussed about the need to promote sustainable food security, production and nutrition, while conserving, protecting and restoring nature as a way of adapting to the looming climate crisis.
“As climate change profoundly disrupts food systems, the only way to safeguard global food security is to prioritise helping small-scale farmers to adapt to the new reality,” said Alvaro Lario, President of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). “The first step is for leaders at COP29 to set an ambitious goal for adaptation finance that allows food production to continue even as the planet warms.”
If scaled up, experts observed that sustainable agricultural practices can reduce emissions, enhance food security, and create resilience against future climate shocks.
“Small-scale farmers often live in poverty and have little choice. They must adapt or will starve,” said Lario, noting that adaptation is a matter of global food security, but also geopolitical stability.
Tanui’s garden has been set up based on a deliberate plan in relation to the principles of permaculture, where it has been divided into five different segments. The first unit is his house, and right outside, there is the second unit, which is a kitchen garden, mainly featuring vegetables that include cabbages, kales, spinach, cowpeas, amaranth, egg plants, and chilli among others.
“The kitchen garden unit must be set next to the house because it requires intensive management, and the crops planted there are needed in the kitchen from time to time,” said Tanui. It is around this area that he has sunk a borehole whose water is pumped using solar energy to an overhead plastic tank before it is directed to the fish pond and the farm using gravitational force.
The next zone is what he calls fertiliser production unit. This is where he keeps poultry, rabbits and dairy goats. “Apart from eggs, we value the chicken droppings so much, which we use as fish feeds, and we also mix them with those from the goats and rabbits, including rabbit urine to make organic fertilisers,” he said.
A recent study by scientists from the Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, a public university located in Multan, Punjab, Pakistan finds that replacing soybean meal with poultry manure in fish feed can result in comparable growth performance for fish as long as it is well processed. The droppings are also rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, making it an excellent source of plant nutrients.
Tanui also uses egg shells from his poultry unit as an important ingredient in making organic fertilisers. Studies have also found that the shells are comprised of about 96 percent calcium carbonate, an essential plant nutrient, and moderates soil acidity.
On the fourth zone, there is a greenhouse where he grows different types of vegetables using manure and locally prepared organic fertilisers. “Unlike the kitchen garden, vegetables from this unit are mainly for income generation,” said the farmer.
In the same zone is a fish pond constructed using wood and thick plastic bags. The inlet of the pond is a plastic bottle with several holes pocked in it, suspended about two feet above the pond, and connects to a pipe that draws water from an overhead water tank.
“When the water drops to the pond from an elevated distance, it forms bubbles on the pond, which helps in supplying oxygen for the fish,” he said. The pond outlet drains directly into the fifth and final unit, known as the food forest.
The food forest, indeed, is a forest, but it features mainly trees and shrubs that produce edible fruits, vegetables such as pumpkins, and crops like sugarcanes, fodder crops for his livestock among others. It is on this unit that he produces organic fertilisers such as bokashi, vermi liquid and compost manure. It is also in this unit where he keeps the Black Soldier Flies for production of chicken and fish feeds.
The food forest as well features an apiculture unit for honey production, where bees constantly pick nectar from a variety of crops on the garden. Within the forest are different medicinal herbs such as ocimum and lemon grass, which can be boiled and inhaled to relieve colds, coughs, among other ailments.
To control pests, the farmer uses insect repellant plants such as Mexican marigold, Rosemary plant, and different types of mints among others.
Apart from agroecology, delegates at COP29 called for more investment in climate smart irrigation, water collecting techniques and infrastructure, drought tolerant crops, agroforestry, and improved soil management.
BAKU, Azerbaijan (PAMACC News) - More than ever before, African environmental Civil Society Organisations, youth groups, and country representatives at the two week 29th climate change summit (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan, united under one voice, calling on the Global North to keep the promise of climate finance, but desist from imposing loans on climate burdened countries.
Kenya is one of the countries bedeviled with such climate related loans of which the government has no option, but to keep taxing the already overtaxed and climate burdened citizens in order to service the ‘climate finance’ debts.
“It is quite immoral to burden African communities who are already paying the ultimate prize of climate change with unfair loans to mitigate a disaster, apparently caused by the financier,” said Jessica Mwanzia, the Climate Finance and Gender Lead at the Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA).
“Africa emits a paltry four percent of the total global greenhouse gases, most of which is absorbed just by one carbon sink – the Congo Basin, leaving the continent with almost no, or extremely insignificant emissions,” said the activist.
The World Bank describes the Congo Basin as the “lungs of Africa”, being one of the largest forest-based carbon sinks in the world, absorbing up to 1.2 billion tons of carbon annually against 1.4 million tons of the emissions from the continent.
“Africa faces a unique climate paradox,” said Dr Augustine Njamnshi, the Director - African Coalition for Sustainable Energy and Access (ACSEA). “We are a continent rich in biodiversity, vast forests, and vital ecosystems that help stabilise the planet, not to mention a continent rich with minerals essential for energy transition, yet, the most impacted by climate disasters,” he said.
The civil society at COP29 intensified the pressure on the developed world to mobilise resources to support African communities with climate adaptation funds that are need-based, and in form of grants.
Ironically, African countries including Kenya are already grappling with loans guised as ‘climate finance’ through projects that purport to ‘prevent further emission,’ or to sequester ‘existing greenhouse gases’ from the atmosphere.
Furthermore, the climate financiers are seeking to recoup back money advanced to the country among other African countries to support climate adaptation projects.
“How can a climate change financier seek to be paid back money invested in a water project for example, set up for a community whose water sources have been destroyed as a result of climate change?” asked Mwanzia. “Loans are supposed to be given to business entities whose main objective is to make profits and not to communities struggling to adapt to climate related disasters,” she said.
Through the Green Climate Fund (GCF), the world largest facility for climate finance that was established within the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to assist developing countries with climate change adaptation and mitigation activities, Kenyan tax payers are among African communities that have been exposed to debt burdens amounting to hundreds of billions of shillings in the name of climate finance.
According to Charles Mwangi, a Nairobi based environment activist, it becomes even more unfair to the taxpayers because some of the projects do not have footprints of the target communities in terms of prioritisation.
So far, Kenya is involved in 20 GCF climate change mitigation and adaptation projects worth hundreds of billions of shillings, some which cut across multiple countries, yet, most of them are earmarked as loans to be serviced by local taxpayers.
According to data available at the GCF website, all the 20 projects are managed by foreign intermediaries with supervisors based in USA, France, UK, Netherlands, and Italy among other countries, apart from only one – ‘Enhancing community resilience and water security in the Upper Athi River Catchment Area, Kenya,’ whose intermediary is the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA).
One of the country specific grants known as ‘Ending Drought Emergencies: Ecosystem Based Adaptation in Kenya’s Arid and Semi-Arid Rangelands’ which is a Sh4 billion adaptation project, but it is managed by IUCN on behalf of Kenya, under the supervision of a Swizz based consultant.
Another Sh13 billion equity financing project known as ‘KawiSafi Ventures Fund,’ targeting Kenya and Rwanda has also been channeled through Acumen Fund Inc, another foreign entity, under supervision of the US based consultant.
Also of interest, is a climate adaptation loan worth Sh25 billion, known as ‘Africa Rural Climate Adaptation Finance Mechanism (ARCAFIM) for East Africa region,’ targeting four Eat African countries. The loan, which is to be serviced by taxpayers in Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and Tanzania has been channeled through the International Fund for Agricultural development (IFAD), under the Rome based consultant.
“It will make more sense if most of these projects are adaptation based with a sense of ownership by local communities who are at the frontline of the climate crisis,” said Dr Wilber Ottichilo, the Governor Vihiga County and the Chair for Environment Committee at the Council of Governors.
The activists pointed out that most of the finances are lost in expensive air tickets for foreign consultants, their hotel bills, and allowances at the expense of poor taxpayers who are as well riddled with climate related disasters.
BAKU, Azerbaijan (PAMACC News) - More than ever before, African environmental Civil Society Organisations, youth groups, and country representatives at the two week 29th climate change summit (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan, united under one voice, calling on the Global North to keep the promise of climate finance, but desist from imposing loans on climate burdened countries.
Kenya is one of the countries bedeviled with such climate related loans of which the government has no option, but to keep taxing the already overtaxed and climate burdened citizens in order to service the ‘climate finance’ debts.
“It is quite immoral to burden African communities who are already paying the ultimate prize of climate change with unfair loans to mitigate a disaster, apparently caused by the financier,” said Jessica Mwanzia, the Climate Finance and Gender Lead at the Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA).
“Africa emits a paltry four percent of the total global greenhouse gases, most of which is absorbed just by one carbon sink – the Congo Basin, leaving the continent with almost no, or extremely insignificant emissions,” said the activist.
The World Bank describes the Congo Basin as the “lungs of Africa”, being one of the largest forest-based carbon sinks in the world, absorbing up to 1.2 billion tons of carbon annually against 1.4 million tons of the emissions from the continent.
“Africa faces a unique climate paradox,” said Dr Augustine Njamnshi, the Director - African Coalition for Sustainable Energy and Access (ACSEA). “We are a continent rich in biodiversity, vast forests, and vital ecosystems that help stabilise the planet, not to mention a continent rich with minerals essential for energy transition, yet, the most impacted by climate disasters,” he said.
The civil society at COP29 intensified the pressure on the developed world to mobilise resources to support African communities with climate adaptation funds that are need-based, and in form of grants.
Ironically, African countries including Kenya are already grappling with loans guised as ‘climate finance’ through projects that purport to ‘prevent further emission,’ or to sequester ‘existing greenhouse gases’ from the atmosphere.
Furthermore, the climate financiers are seeking to recoup back money advanced to the country among other African countries to support climate adaptation projects.
“How can a climate change financier seek to be paid back money invested in a water project for example, set up for a community whose water sources have been destroyed as a result of climate change?” asked Mwanzia. “Loans are supposed to be given to business entities whose main objective is to make profits and not to communities struggling to adapt to climate related disasters,” she said.
Through the Green Climate Fund (GCF), the world largest facility for climate finance that was established within the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to assist developing countries with climate change adaptation and mitigation activities, Kenyan tax payers are among African communities that have been exposed to debt burdens amounting to hundreds of billions of shillings in the name of climate finance.
According to Charles Mwangi, a Nairobi based environment activist, it becomes even more unfair to the taxpayers because some of the projects do not have footprints of the target communities in terms of prioritisation.
So far, Kenya is involved in 20 GCF climate change mitigation and adaptation projects worth hundreds of billions of shillings, some which cut across multiple countries, yet, most of them are earmarked as loans to be serviced by local taxpayers.
According to data available at the GCF website, all the 20 projects are managed by foreign intermediaries with supervisors based in USA, France, UK, Netherlands, and Italy among other countries, apart from only one – ‘Enhancing community resilience and water security in the Upper Athi River Catchment Area, Kenya,’ whose intermediary is the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA).
One of the country specific grants known as ‘Ending Drought Emergencies: Ecosystem Based Adaptation in Kenya’s Arid and Semi-Arid Rangelands’ which is a Sh4 billion adaptation project, but it is managed by IUCN on behalf of Kenya, under the supervision of a Swizz based consultant.
Another Sh13 billion equity financing project known as ‘KawiSafi Ventures Fund,’ targeting Kenya and Rwanda has also been channeled through Acumen Fund Inc, another foreign entity, under supervision of the US based consultant.
Also of interest, is a climate adaptation loan worth Sh25 billion, known as ‘Africa Rural Climate Adaptation Finance Mechanism (ARCAFIM) for East Africa region,’ targeting four Eat African countries. The loan, which is to be serviced by taxpayers in Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and Tanzania has been channeled through the International Fund for Agricultural development (IFAD), under the Rome based consultant.
“It will make more sense if most of these projects are adaptation based with a sense of ownership by local communities who are at the frontline of the climate crisis,” said Dr Wilber Ottichilo, the Governor Vihiga County and the Chair for Environment Committee at the Council of Governors.
The activists pointed out that most of the finances are lost in expensive air tickets for foreign consultants, their hotel bills, and allowances at the expense of poor taxpayers who are as well riddled with climate related disasters.
BAKU, Azerbaijan (PAMACC News) – African environmental activists at the ongoing COP29 climate summit in Baku are urging climate financiers to stop burdening poor countries with unmanageable loans under the guise of funding climate adaptation and mitigation projects.
Just a few months ago, widespread protests erupted in East and West Africa, led by young people demanding an end to heavy taxes imposed by governments to service foreign loans—many of which have been embezzled by corrupt leaders.
“We reject loans and any form of debt for a continent that had no role in causing global warming. We refuse to borrow from the arsonist to put out the fire they started and which is burning our livelihoods,” said Dr. Mithika Mwenda, Executive Director of the Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA).
According to PACJA, between 70 and 80 percent of financing from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) to African countries comes in the form of loans, often routed through intermediaries. In practice, only a fraction of these funds—sometimes less than 10 percent—actually reach the climate-burdened communities that need them most.
“We demand that these finances be directed first and foremost toward those most exposed to climate risks and least able to adapt,” Dr. Mwenda continued. “This means moving beyond fragmented and delayed funding and ensuring a reliable, affordable, accessible, and timely flow of finance—preferably in the form of grants—that matches the scale of the crisis,” he said during Africa Day, an annual event organized by the African Development Bank on the sidelines of COP29.
One of the many problematic financial instruments imposed on African countries is the Sustainable Renewables Risk Mitigation Initiative (SRMI) Facility. This initiative, primarily a mitigation project aimed at offsetting 89 million tons of carbon emissions, has seen six African countries and one from Asia-Pacific (Kenya, DR Congo, Namibia, Mali, Botswana, and the Central African Republic) saddled with a loan of USD 1.6 billion. This loan, intended to offset emissions primarily from the Global North, will have to be repaid by the very communities already bearing the brunt of climate change.
Despite Africa contributing less than 4 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, these countries are expected to repay loans taken for projects designed to mitigate the environmental damage caused by wealthier nations. The GCF approved the project on March 19, 2021, with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Development Association overseeing its implementation, under the supervision of Mr. Zhihong Zhang, a Senior Carbon Finance Specialist based in Washington, D.C.
Another example is the Leveraging Energy Access Finance (LEAF) Framework, approved on July 1, 2021, and implemented by the African Development Bank (AfDB). The project, meant to help Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tunisia avoid emitting 29.9 million tons of greenhouse gases, requires repayment of a loan amounting to USD 959.9 million. The burden of this loan will fall on poor taxpayers, many of whom are already suffering the impacts of climate change.
Activists argue that focusing on mitigation loans for African countries is a misplaced priority. Even if Africa were to stop emitting all greenhouse gases, the continent’s contribution to the global carbon footprint is so minimal that it would not significantly alter the course of global warming.
In addition to mitigation loans, the GCF is also seeking to recoup some of the funds it has disbursed to poor countries for climate adaptation. One such project is the Africa Rural Climate Adaptation Finance Mechanism (ARCAFIM) for East Africa, approved on October 25, 2023. The project, which is being implemented by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), will provide financing for climate adaptation in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, and Rwanda. However, the loan of USD 200 million will need to be repaid by the very taxpayers who are already suffering from the consequences of climate change.
“Many of these projects lack the input of the communities they are meant to serve,” said Charles Mwangi, a Nairobi-based climate activist. “Communities must be at the forefront of decision-making when framing these projects. Instead, much of the funding is lost to exorbitant costs like expensive airfares for foreign consultants, hotel bills, and allowances,” he added.
In contrast to these externally imposed projects, Kenya is piloting the Financing Locally-Led Climate Action (FLLoCA) initiative, a five-year program supported by the Government of Kenya, the World Bank, and other donors. FLLoCA is designed to support locally-led climate resilience actions, strengthening both county and national governments’ capacity to manage climate risks.
“We are advocating for policies that prioritize adaptation, not as an afterthought, but as a central pillar of climate finance,” Dr. Mwenda said. “We must amplify the voices of local organizations and grassroots leaders to ensure that global commitments reflect the real priorities on the ground.”
At COP29, the discussions on the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) offer a critical opportunity to reshape global climate finance in a way that aligns with Africa’s needs.
“It is essential that adaptation finance be needs-based, mobilized from public funds in the Global North, and provided as grants, not loans,” Dr. Mwenda emphasized. “The private sector should be considered a third or fourth option, not the first.”
